GARDEN OF UN-EARTHLY DELIGHTS
– Beth Citron, 2023
From the time of her MFA studies at Goldsmith’s College in London in the mid 2000s, artist Suhasini Kejriwal has created profoundly imaginative landscapes that draw on detailed observations from her daily life. Kejriwal’s rigorous practice spans painting and sculpture, and figuration and abstraction, investigating the unruliness of urban, jungle, and desert environments and the unusual juxtapositions and hybridities that mark everyday visual culture in India today. A hallmark of Kejriwal’s practice is her integration of multiple materials and densities into individual works, with paintings incorporating drawing, photography, collage, and collaboration, and large-scale sculptures adorned with hand-embroidered or intricately painted surfaces. Episodically, Kejriwal has returned to the study of natural forms and the creatures that dwell amidst them, with earlier presentations of teeming paintings and anthropomorphic totems in London and at the Anokhi Museum in Jaipur. Kejriwal uses real references to bridge organic and geometric flora and foliage, building a landscape that is transcendent in detail, color, and saturation. In this work as across her practice, Kejriwal attends to the breadth of psychological, conceptual, and even historical relationships underlying individual formal choices. For example, in this series, all of the botanicals and leaves are drawn directly from species in her own home garden, a sanctuary during the years of the covid pandemic while simultaneously a testament to the isolation and uncomfortable stillness of the period. In this sense, Kejriwal performs seriously the role of witness, not only in an adherence to what is seen and but also with the commitment to felt experience. Kejriwal has developed a particular and canny interest in the transnational history of English gardens, mapping the movement of her own work onto colonial and postcolonial histories across Britain and India. As part of the process of “taming” India and overlaying an image of home onto the subcontinent, the British brought many botanical species and designs for gardens to India (where the refined Mughal garden had reigned for several centuries). This has resulted in many new and hybrid species in urban India today, which Kejriwal comments on through evocative and sometimes psychedelic layers of images in her compositions. These works reject both the implied orientalist exoticism of the subcontinent and the propriety of the manicured English garden, especially as they are now – perhaps ironically – exported again to London in a contemporary global context. The long-term cross-pollinations and solidarities resulting from colonial histories also parallel Kejriwal’s interest in deep time, a scale of measuring the earth that extends beyond the human. While earlier versions of Kejriwal’s totemic sculptures featured embroidered surfaces and examined the relationship between hard and soft materials, this series reflects an evolution to hand-painted bronze and an enlarged scale. In this medium, the artist aligns herself with a conventional material of monumental public sculpture while also retaining her position as a painter attuned to small and fantastical forms. At the same time, and perhaps most radically, Kejriwal’s sculptures defy the figural expectation of totems, showing the enormous and indeed enduring power of nature across past and future, and the otherworldly and everyday.
GARDEN OF UN-EARTHLY DELIGHTS 2005–2009
Untitled, acrylic paint and paper on canvas, 72 in x 48 in, 2005
Installation view, Goldsmiths College MA degree show, 2006
Untitled, acrylic paint, paper, fibre glass, metal, resin, diameter 48 in, 2005
Untitled, paper, acrylic paint on canvas, 12 in x 18 in, 2007
Untitled, paper, acrylic paint on canvas, 18 in x 12 in, 2007
Untitled, paper, acrylic paint on canvas, 12 in x 18 in, 2007
Untitled, paper, acrylic paint on canvas, 36 in x 24 in, 2007
Untitled, paper, acrylic paint on canvas, 18 in x 12 in, 2007
Untitled, paper, acrylic paint on canvas, 18 in x 12 in, 2007
Untitled, paper, acrylic paint on canvas, 12 in x 18 in, 2007
Untitled, paper, acrylic paint on canvas, 18 in x 12 in, 2007
Untitled, paper, acrylic paint on canvas, 18 in x 12 in, 2007
Untitled, paper, acrylic paint on canvas, 18 in x 12 in, 2007
Garden of Un-Earthly Delights, 2009, Anokhi Museum, Installation view
Garden of Un-Earthly Delights, 2009, Anokhi Museum, Installation view
Garden of Un-Earthly Delights, 2009, Anokhi Museum, Detail
Garden of Un-Earthly Delights, Anokhi Museum, 2009, Installation view
Garden of Un-Earthly Delights, Anokhi Museum, 2009, Detail
Untitled, Garden of Un-Earthly Delights, Anokhi Museum, 2009, Installation view
Untitled, Garden of Un-Earthly Delights, velvet, metal, fibre glass, height 36 in, 2009
Advertisement for Heaven or Hell, fake fur, hair wigs, fibre glass, Nature Morte, 2007, Installation View
Untitled, synthetic wig, synthetic fur, fibre glass, 2009
Untitled, paper, acrylic paint on canvas, 24 in x 36 in, 2007
Untitled, paper, acrylic paint on canvas, 60 in x 84 in, 2007
Installation View, Nature Morte, 2007
Untitled, acrylic paint on canvas, height 27 in, 2009
Untitled, acrylic paint on fibre glass, length 24 in, 2008
Untitled, paper and acrylic paint on wood, 15 in x 13 in x 15 in, 2008
Untitled, paper and acrylic paint on wood, 15 in x 13 in x 15 in, 2008
Untitled, acrylic paint on canvas, 72 in x 108 in, 2009
Untitled, acrylic paint on canvas, 36 in x 48 in, 2010
Untitled, acrylic paint on canvas, 96 in x 72 in, 2008
Untitled, acrylic on canvas, 6 ft x 4 ft, 2011
Through my works in Garden of Un-earthly Delights, I try to explore the place that Nature holds in the human imagination today.
I construct images and places that are at once gardens and urban jungles – both psychological constructs and cultural landscapes. In my sculptures of fictional, anthropomorphized plants that are composed of brightly colored body parts and foliage, I reflect upon the Human/Nature divide, and how the gap between the real and the imaginary, the everyday and the fantastic, and the familiar and the unfamiliar is constantly being negotiated in our own perception.
How has technology changed the way we look at Nature? Plants and animals that were once exotic are now commonplace – instantly recognizable from their many images in magazines, on television, and on the internet. The human body is hardly as mysterious as it once was. Graphic, highly detailed images and videos of all these are now a part of popular culture. But it seems that despite this abundance of information, Nature and the human body continue to compel the human imagination. Like our ancestors, we continue to be fascinated by our bodies and our surroundings. They are not only a part of science and fine art but also a part of popular culture and design.
I am also interested in engaging with how artists have viewed Nature and the human body through different periods in the history of art. It is like a vast archive of human consciousness – a rich resource for understanding the evolution of the human viewpoint on the body, its surroundings and, indeed, Nature. For instance, the excess, theatricality, and dark humour in the works of the surrealists completely changed how we view everyday objects and the human body. In fact, a few centuries ago, Hieronymus Bosch’s famous Garden of Earthly Delights was an early precursor to the works of the surrealists because of its joyful excess, theatricality, absurdity and hallucinatory details. In a completely different way, Rousseau’s evocation of an imaginary, exotic world constructed almost entirely from second-hand sources in his studio has the power to lift us from the mundane into another world altogether. Similarly, over the centuries, many artists have created windows into imaginary, fictional worlds that help us transcend the numbing reality of the everyday.
Over the years, however, with the crazy proliferation of images in the media, both print and virtual, it has become increasingly difficult for an artist to present a fresh and memorable image. Our consciousness is not easily touched, let alone shocked. Images are too easily consumed and discarded. So, in these circumstances, a dense, intense image that slows down our interaction with it has the potential to provide us with a rich, meaningful visual experience. The use of deliberate contradictions and juxtapositions in the work, both visually as well as materially, allows the emergence of a strange, compelling beauty which may, in turn, become a possible springboard for the transformation of the mind and emotion.